Cuando el trabajo aburre: Análisis de las propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Aburrimiento Laboral (EAL)
Resumen
El aburrimiento laboral es un fenómeno psicosocial que puede afectar a las personas en su trabajo y que se asocia con ambientes poco retadores y de baja estimulación. Para entender mejor este fenómeno, es necesario contar con instrumentos adecuados para su medición. La presente investigación tuvo el propósito de analizar las propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Aburrimiento Laboral (EAL): validez de constructo, análisis de confiabilidad, análisis de los ítems, validez convergente y discriminante. Se realizaron tres estudios independientes con una muestra total de 2,032 participantes. El primer estudio evidencia que la EAL posee una estructura unifactorial y una confiabilidad apropiada. El segundo estudio provee evidencia de la validez convergente de la EAL con el Dutch Boredom Scale. El tercer estudio evidencia la validez discriminante de la EAL con la Escala de Engagement en el Trabajo de Utrecht. A la luz de los hallazgos, concluimos que la EAL es un excelente instrumento para medir el aburrimiento en el trabajo.
Recibido: 22/12/2016 Aceptado: 25/04/2017
Cómo citar este artículo: Martínez Lugo, M. & Rodríguez-Montalbán, R. (2016). Cuando el trabajo aburre: Análisis de las propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Aburrimiento Laboral (EAL). Revista Interamericana de Psicología Ocupacional, 35(1), 7-20. Doi: 10.21772/ripo.v35n1a01
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
PDFReferencias
Alda, M., Minguez, J., Montero-Marín, J., Gili, M., PueblaGuedea,
M., Herrera-Mercadal, P., Navarro-Gil, M. & García-Campayo, J. (2015). Validation of the Spanish version of the Multidimensional State Boredom Scale (MSBS). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13:59. DOI 10.1186/s12955-015-0252-2
Baker, P. L. (1992). Bored and busy: Sociology of knowledge
of clerical workers. Sociological Perspectives, 35(3), 489-503.
Brown, T.A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd Ed.). New York: Guildford Press.
Bruursema, K., (2007). How individual values and trait boredom interface with job characteristics and job boredom in their effects on counterproductive work behavior. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/646
Bruursema, K., Kessler, S.R. & Spector, P. (2011). Bored employees misbehaving: The relationship between boredom and counterproductive work behavior. Work & Stress, 25(2), 93-107.
Chin, W. W. & Newsted, P. R. (1999). Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 307–341).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Culp, N.A. (2006). The relationship of two facets of boredom proneness with the major dimensions of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 999-1007.
Fahlman, S., Mercer-Lynn, K., Flora, D. & Eastwood, J. (2011). Development and validation of the Multidimensional State Boredom Scale. Assessment, 20, 68-85. doi: 10.1177/1073191111421303
Farmer, R. & Sundberg, N.D. (1986). Boredom proneness: The development and correlates of a new scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 4-17.
Fisher, C.D. (1993). Boredom at work: A neglected concept. Human Relations, 46(3), 395-417).
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural Equation Models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
Gemmill, G. & Oakley, J. (1992). The meaning of boredom in organizational life. Group & Organization Management, 17, 358-369.
González-Romá, V., Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. & Lloret, S. (2006). Burnout and work engagement: Independent factors or opposite poles? Jounal Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 65–174
Guglielmi, D., Simbula, S., Mazzetti, G., Tabanelli, M.C. & Bonfiglioli, R. (2013). When the job is boring: The role of boredom in organizational contexts. Work, 45, 311-322.
Harju, L., Hakanen, J.J., & Schaufeli, W.B. (2014). Job boredom and its correlates in 87 Finnish organizations. Journal of Occupational and
Environmental Medicine, 56(9), 911-918.
Hill, A. B. (1975). Work variety and individual differences in occupational boredom. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(1), 128-131.
Kass, S.J., Vodanovich, S.J., & Callender, A. (2001). Statetrait boredom: Relationship to absenteeism, tenure, and job satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16, 317-327.
Kline, T. J. B. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Locke, E. A., & Bryan, J. F. (1967). Performance goals as determinants of level of performance and boredom. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 51(2), 120-130.
Loukidou, L., Loan-Clarke, J. & Daniels, K. (2009). Boredom in the workplace: More than monotonous tasks. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(4), 381-405.
Mann, S. (2012). Boredom at the checkout: Causes, coping strategies and outcomes of workplace boredom in a supermarket setting. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 6(2), 1-14.
Martin, M., Sadlo, G. & Stew, G. (2006). The phenomenon of boredom. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 193-211.
Mikulas, W. & Vodanovich, S. (1993). The essence of boredom. The Psychological Record, 43, 3-12.
Nunnally, J.C. & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
O’Hanlon, J. (1981). Boredom: Practical consequences and a theory. Acta Psychologica, 49, 53-82.
Piotrowski, C. (2013). Boredom research: an analysis of topical domain and historical trends. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 40 (2), 50-52.
Raykov, T., & Shrout, P. E. (2002). Reliability of scales with general structure: Point and interval estimation using a structural equation modeling approach. Structural equation modeling, 9(2), 195-212.
Reijseger, G., Schaufeli, W., Peeters, M., Taris, T., van Beek, I. & Ouweneel, E. (2012). Watching the paint dry at work: psychometric examination of the Dutch Boredom Scale. Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An
International Journal, 26(5), 508-525.
Rodríguez-Montalbán, R., Vélez-Pastrana, M. & MeléndezSáez, M. (2012). El engagement y la interacción familia-trabajo: Un estudio exploratorio. Revista Interamericana de Psicología Ocupacional, 31(2), 73-84.
Rodríguez-Montalbán, R., Martínez-Lugo, M., SánchezCardona, I. (2014). Análisis de las propiedades psicométricas de la Utrecht Work Engagement Scale en una muestra de trabajadores en Puerto Rico.
Universitas Psychologica, 13(4), 1255-1266.
Salanova, M. & Schaufeli, W.B. (2008). A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behaviour. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 116-131.
Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W.B., Llorens, S., Peiro, J.M. & Grau, R. (2000). Desde el ‘burnout’ al ‘engagement’: ¿Una nueva perspectiva? Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y las Organizaciones, 16, 117-134.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716.
Schaufeli, W., & Salanova, M. (2007). Work engagement:An emerging psychological concept and its implications for organizations. In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. P. Skarlicki (Eds.), Research in social issues in management (Volume 5): Managing social and ethical issues in organizations (pp. 135-177).
Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers. Schaufeli, W. & Salanova, M. (2014). Burnout, boredom and engagement. En M.C.W. Peeters, J. de Jonge & T.W. Taris. An introduction to contemporary work sychology (pp.293-320). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A.B (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
Smith, M. (1944). Handbook of industrial psychology. New York: Philosophical Library.
Sohail, N., Ahmad, B., Tanveer, Y. & Tarik, H. (2012). Workplace boredom among university faculty members in Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(10), 919-925.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Van der Heijden, G., Schepers, J. & Nijssen, E. (2012). Understanding workplace boredom among white collar employees: temporary reactions and individual differences. European Journal of Work and
Organizational Psychology, 21(3), 349-375.
van Hooff, M.L.M. & van Hooft, E.A.J. (2014). Boredom at work: proximal and distal consequences of affective work-related boredom. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(3), 348-359.
van Hooff, M.L.M. & van Hooft, E.A.J. (2016). Workrelated boredom and depressed mood from a daily perspective: the moderating roles of work centrality and need satisfaction. Work & Stress, 30(3), 209-227.
van Wyk, S.M., De Beer, L.T., Pienaar, J. & Schufeli, W.B. (2016). The psychometric properties of a workplace boredom scale (DUBS) within the South African context. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 42(1),
a1326.
Vodanovich, S. (2003). Psychometric measures of boredom: A review of the literature. The Journal of Psychology, 137(6), 569-595.
Vodanovich, S. & Watt, J.D. (2016). Self-report measures of boredom: An updated review of the literature. The Journal of Psychology, 150(2), 196-228.
Watt, J.D. (2002). Fighting more than fires: Boredom proneness, workload stress, and underemployment among urban firefighters. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 2637.
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
ISSN: 2539-5238 (Reemplaza a 0120-3800) ISSN-e: 2500-5669
Revista Interamericana de Psicología Ocupacional
Editada por: Centro de Investigación en Comportamiento Organizacional Cincel S.A.S.
Correo de contacto: psicocupacional@cincel.com.co
Carrera 25 A #1-31 Oficina 1102.
Teléfono (57-4) 444 1546
Medellín-Colombia
