Varianza común del método: el caso de los cuestionarios
Resumen
Los resultados de una investigacion con 70 jugadores de fútbol americano, cuyo objetivo es identificar la presencia de la varianza común del rnetodo atribuible al uso del cuestionario y a la deseabilidad social, revelan la existencia de un factor no identificado en el que cargan 18 de los 24 reactivos y que deseabilidad social no es el factor sesgante. El documento define que es varianza común del método, analiza los riesgos a los que enfrentan los usuarios de cuestionarios y presenta altemativas útiles para diagnosticar y corregir sesgos que afectan las relaciones entre constructos.
AbstractResults of a study conducted with 70 american football players of the same team, wich objetive is to identify the presence of the common method variance attributed to survey desing and social desirability, show the presence of a non-identified factor that loads on 18 of the 24 items and that social desirability is not the biasing factor This paper defines common method variance and analyzes risks that survey researchers face and lists useful solutions that apply in identifying and correcting biases that affect relationships among constructs.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
PDFReferencias
Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
Alf, E. F. & Graf, R. G. (1999) Asymptotic confidence limits for the difference between two squared multiple correlations: A simplified approach. Psychological Methods, 4, 70-75.
Arias F., Mercado, P. y Belausteguigoitia, I. (2000). El compromiso personal hacia la organizacion y el clima organizacional, la búsqueda de empleo, la intención de permanencia y el esfuerzo. Revista Interamericana de Psicología Ocupacional,19,4-15.
Bechger, T. M. (1998). Browne's composite direct product model for MTMM correlation matrices. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 191-204.
Belausteguigoitia, I. (2000) “La influencia del clima organizacional en el compromiso hacia la organización y el esfuerzo percibido en miembros de empresas familiares mexicanas”. Tesis doctoral. Facultad de Contaduría y Administración, U.N.A.M.
Brown, S.P. & Leigh, T.W. (1996). Anew look at psychological climate an its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81,358-168.
Cote, J.A., & Buckley, R. (1998). Measurement error and theory testing in consumer research: An illustration of the importance of construct validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 579-582.
Crowne, D., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive Studies in evaluative dependence. New York: Wiley.
Hosmer, L. & Kiewitz, C. (2005). Organizational Justice: Abehavioral science concept with critical implications for business ethics and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quartely, 15, 1, 67-91.
Kammeyer-Mueller, J.D. & Wanberg, C.R. (2003). Unwrapping the Organizational Entry Process: Disentangling Multiple Antecedents and Their Pathways to Adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 5.
Littlewood, H. (2006) De cuerpo presente; un estudio de evitación del trabajo. Manuscrito.
Littlewood, H.; Flores. R.; Castañeda, A.; y Mercado, P. (2005). Entrevista Realista de Selección, Satisfacción en el Trabajo e Intención de Permanencia. X Foro de Investigación de la FCA-UNAM.
Olkin, I., & Finn, J.D. (1995) Correlations redux. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 155-164.
Premack S.L., Wanous J.P. (1985). A meta-analysis of realistic job preview experiments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70,706-719.
Podsakoff, M.P., MacKenzie, S.C., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88,5, 879-903.
Simons, T. & Roberson, Q. (2003). Why Managers Should Care About Fairness: The Effects of Aggregate Justice Perceptions on Organizational Outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 3, 432-443.
Sheridan, J. (1985). A catastrophe model of employee withdrawal leading to low job performance, high absenteeism, and job turnover during the first year of employmet. Academy of Management Journal, 28: 88-109.
Spector, P. E.,Chen, P. Y.. & O'Connell, B. J. (2000). A longitudinal study of relations between job stressors and job strains while controlling for prior negative affectivity and strains. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 211 - 218.
Tekleab, A.; Takeuchi, R; & Taylor, M.S. (2005). Extending the chain of relationships among organizational justice, social Exchange, and employee reactions: The role of contact violations. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 1, 146-157.
Williams, L.J., & Brown, B.K (1994). Method variance in organizational behavior and human resources research: Effects on correlations, path coefficients, and hypothesis testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 185 - 209.
Yang, J.; Peng, T. K.; & Mossholder, K. (2004). Procedural Justice, Climate and Group Power Distance Orientation: A case of Cross-Level Effects. Department of Management, Louisiana State University, USA.
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
ISSN: 2539-5238 (Reemplaza a 0120-3800) ISSN-e: 2500-5669
Revista Interamericana de Psicología Ocupacional
Editada por: Centro de Investigación en Comportamiento Organizacional Cincel S.A.S.
Correo de contacto: psicocupacional@cincel.com.co
Carrera 25 A #1-31 Oficina 1102.
Teléfono (57-4) 444 1546
Medellín-Colombia
